Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Assessing protein-specific radiation damage in time-resolved X-ray solution-scattering experiments at high-brilliance synchrotrons using fast detector readout.

Created on 18 Oct 2026

Authors

Fatemeh Sabzian-Molaei, Tomás S Plivelic, Magnus Andersson

Published in

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology. Volume 82. Issue Pt 7. Pages 715-726. Jul 01, 2026. Epub Jun 12, 2026.

Abstract

Time-resolved X-ray solution scattering (TR-XSS) enables tracking of protein structural dynamics but can suffer from radiation damage when performed with continuous X-ray beam exposure at multipurpose small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) beamlines. Here, we systematically assess how protein concentration, exposure time, X-ray dose and beam focusing influence the stability of adenylate kinase (AdK) during TR-XSS at CoSAXS at the MAX IV Laboratory. Static SAXS measurements from 2.5 to 21 mg ml-1 showed only minor interparticle effects, establishing suitable concentrations for TR-XSS. Under detector-focused conditions, AdK irradiated at room temperature remained stable up to 3.13 kGy, with consistent absolute and difference scattering profiles over 50 ms. In contrast, focusing the beam directly on the sample increased the absorbed dose to 21.3 kGy and produced clear signatures of radiation damage, which included low-q intensity loss and increasing deviation from the low-dose condition. These results identify practical system-specific dose limits and highlight beam focusing as a key determinant of sample integrity. The workflow presented here provides general guidelines for minimizing radiation artifacts in TR-XSS on multipurpose SAXS beamlines.

PMID:
42283204
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement