Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Orally-administered beta-cyclodextrin as a novel countermeasure for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid toxicity in mice.

Created on 18 Oct 2026

Authors

Sergey Kalinin, Andrea Saji, Rebecca Alemani, Zachary McDonald, Intakhar Ahmad, Robert Sargis, Israel Rubinstein, Douglas L Feinstein

Published in

Toxicology communications. Volume 10. Issue 1. Pages 1-18. Feb 10, 2026.

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are associated with an increased risk of several cancers, immune disorders, and neuropathology. These actions are compounded by their long half-lives.
We tested if exposure to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) worsens disease progression or reduces survival in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, and if treatment with beta-cyclodextrin (βCD, which encapsulates PFOS) mitigated PFOS effects. Adult female C57BL/6 mice were provided drinking water containing 0 (control) or 20 μg/mL PFOS for 2 weeks, immunized to develop EAE, then provided standard chow or chow containing 2% w/w βCD.
Control EAE mice exhibited typical disease progression, irrespective of being on standard or βCD chow. By 10 days post immunization, PFOS-exposed EAE kept on standard chow began to die, reaching nearly 60% mortality (5/8) at day 17. In contrast, in PFOS-exposed EAE mice provided βCD chow, mortality was reduced to 12% (1/8). The quantification of plasma PFOS concentrations showed an approximately 60% reduction in βCD-treated mice compared to mice kept on standard chow.
These findings suggest that PFOS led to systemic immune dysregulation upon immunization or that EAE induction lowered the threshold for PFOS-induced mortality.
Providing dietary βCD can accelerate PFOS clearance.

PMID:
42891199
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement