Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association between use of nutrition labels and healthy eating efforts before and after labeling policy changes in Mexico, 2019-2021.

Created on 18 Oct 2026

Authors

Cecilia I Oviedo-Solís, Kathia L Quevedo, Alejandra Jáuregui, Alejandra Contreras, Lana Vanderlee, Rachel E Davis, James F Thrasher, David Hammond

Published in

Preventive medicine reports. Volume 71. Pages 103624. Epub Sep 12, 2026.

Abstract

To examine associations between self-reported use of Nutrition Fact Tables (NFTs) and front-of-package nutrition labels (FoPNLs) with self-reported healthy eating efforts, and to assess whether these associations became stronger after Mexico replaced Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA) with Warning Labels (WL).
Data come from the 2019 and 2021 Mexico administration of the International Food Policy Study, a repeated cross-sectional online survey of adults aged 18-100 years (n = 8435). Participants reported use of FoPNLs and NFTs, and five healthy eating efforts: consume less calories, saturated fat, sugar, sodium, and non-sugar sweeteners. Adjusted logistic regression models estimated associations between reported label use and engagement in any healthy eating effort, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.
FoPNL use increased by 10.3 percentage points, and NFT use increased by 4.4 percentage points between 2019 and 2021. Participants who reported using NFTs and FoPNLs were more likely to engage in healthy eating efforts (OR range: 1.52-1.82). Associations between label use and healthy eating efforts did not differ by survey year.
Reported use of FoPNL and NFT increased after 2020 policy changes in Mexico. The association between self-reported label use and self-reported healthy eating efforts did not differ between 2019 and 2021.

PMID:
42891038
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement