Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mortality of Candida auris candidemia compared with non-auris candidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Created on 18 Oct 2026

Authors

Jing Chen, Na Xiao, Qian Xiang, Yan Luo, Hui Wang, Tian-Fen Liao

Published in

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. Volume 16. Pages 1952600. Epub Oct 02, 2026.

Abstract

Candida auris has emerged as a globally significant healthcare-associated fungal pathogen. Although descriptive studies have reported high mortality for candidemia caused by C. auris, whether the mortality differs from non-auris candidemia remains unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the mortality between patients with C. auris and non-auris candidemia.
We searched PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies published before June 2026. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.
A total of 16 articles were included in this meta-analysis. In the pooled crude analysis, mortality was significantly lower in patients with C. auris candidemia than in those with non-auris candidemia (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.90). Subgroup analyses showed significant geographic variation (P for interaction = 0.019), with lower mortality observed in studies from Turkey, the Middle East and the Americas, but not in South Asia and Africa. Despite lower mortality, C. auris candidemia was associated with prolonged hospitalization in descriptive analysis.
In this meta-analysis of crude estimates, mortality was significantly lower in patients with C. auris candidemia than in those with non-auris candidemia. However, prolonged hospitalization in C. auris infection highlights its medical resource burden. For clinicians, management of C. auris candidemia should focus on timely diagnosis, appropriate antifungal therapy, and strengthened infection prevention, especially in cases of long-term hospitalization.

PMID:
42890631
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement