Temporal changes in lipoprotein(a) after acute coronary syndrome.

Authors

Christelle Lattouf, Mark Atallah, Nadim Nasrallah, Tarek Harb, Gary Gerstenblith, Thorsten M Leucker

Published in

American journal of preventive cardiology. Volume 31. Pages 101723. Epub Aug 28, 2026.

Abstract

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and is traditionally considered stable. Its behavior following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and clinical implications remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize the temporal trajectory of Lp(a) following ACS, evaluate whether baseline levels predict longitudinal changes, and assess the stability of clinically relevant Lp(a) risk categories.
In this prospective study, 225 patients with ACS underwent serial Lp(a) measurements during hospitalization and at follow-up (≥6 months). Longitudinal changes were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Associations between baseline Lp(a) and changes over time were evaluated using Spearman correlation. Stability of Lp(a) threshold risk categories (<50, 50-105, ≥105 nmol/L) was assessed by examining transitions across categories.
Lp(a) increased following ACS (p < 0.001), peaking at Days 4-7 (+30.0 %, p = 0.0001) and remaining elevated at Day 30 (+15.0 %, p = 0.0042), before returning to baseline at follow-up. Among individuals with increases in Lp(a), baseline Lp(a) was the strongest determinant of trajectory, with higher levels associated with greater increases at all timepoints (ρ 0.37-0.63, all p < 0.05). Categories for those evels in the low (<50 nmol/L) and high (≥105 nmol/L) categories remained stable with minimal reclassification. Variability was confined to levels in the intermediate range (50-105 nmol/L), where 37.5 % transitioned to ≥105 nmol/L.
Lp(a) rises transiently after ACS and returns to baseline over time. Levels in the high and low risk categories remain in those categories, while variability is limited to the intermediate range. A single Lp(a) measurement obtained during ACS may be sufficient for individuals with clearly low or markedly elevated Lp(a) levels, whereas repeat testing after clinical stabilization may be considered for patients with intermediate or borderline baseline levels.

PMID:
42893181
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.