Lumbar Facet Joint Morphology and Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors

Alberto Suarez, Justin Gumbs, Michelle Schmidt, Zeena Shather, Hanna Neustadter, Dominic Lafalce, Marissa Middleton, Jaden Wise, Isabella Merem, Maohua Lin, Frank D Vrionis

Published in

Global spine journal. Pages 21925682261499356. Oct 18, 2026. Epub Oct 18, 2026.

Abstract

Study DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.ObjectivesTo evaluate the associations between lumbar facet orientation, facet tropism, and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), while assessing sex-specific differences in facet morphology.MethodsA PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261417450). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched through June 2026. Studies evaluating lumbar facet morphology in adults with DLS were included. Random-effects meta-analyses using restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment were performed. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed.ResultsThirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies (3,321 participants) were included in the facet orientation meta-analysis. Patients with DLS demonstrated more sagittally oriented facet joints than controls (SMD 1.30, 95% CI 0.78-1.82; p < 0.0001; I² = 97.2%). Nine studies (1,913 participants) showed greater continuous facet tropism in DLS patients (MD 2.72°, 95% CI 2.07°-3.38°; p < 0.0001; I² = 47.2%). Binary facet tropism was not statistically significant (OR 2.20, 95% CI 0.85-5.66; p = 0.0817). Sex-specific, severity, and instability data were insufficient for quantitative synthesis.ConclusionDLS is associated with more sagittally oriented facet joints and greater continuous facet tropism than controls. Limited sex-specific data and heterogeneity highlight the need for standardized measurement techniques and prospective longitudinal studies to clarify causality and sex-related effects.

PMID:
42893425
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.