Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

NF-ULA: Normalizing flow-based unadjusted Langevin algorithm for imaging inverse problems.

Created on 18 Oct 2026

Authors

Ziruo Cai, Junqi Tang, Subhadip Mukherjee, Jinglai Li, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Xiaoqun Zhang

Published in

SIAM journal on imaging sciences. Volume 17. Issue 2. Pages 820-860. Jun 30, 2024. Epub Apr 08, 2024.

Abstract

Bayesian methods for solving inverse problems are a powerful alternative to classical methods since the Bayesian approach offers the ability to quantify the uncertainty in the solution. In recent years, data-driven techniques for solving inverse problems have also been remarkably successful, due to their superior representation ability. In this work, we incorporate data-based models into a class of Langevin-based sampling algorithms for Bayesian inference in imaging inverse problems. In particular, we introduce NF-ULA (Normalizing Flow-based Unadjusted Langevin algorithm), which involves learning a normalizing flow (NF) as the image prior. We use NF to learn the prior because a tractable closed-form expression for the log prior enables the differentiation of it using autograd libraries. Our algorithm only requires a normalizing flow-based generative network, which can be pre-trained independently of the considered inverse problem and the forward operator. We perform theoretical analysis by investigating the well-posedness and non-asymptotic convergence of the resulting NF-ULA algorithm. The efficacy of the proposed NF-ULA algorithm is demonstrated in various image restoration problems such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and limited-angle X-ray computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. NF-ULA is found to perform better than competing methods for severely ill-posed inverse problems.

PMID:
42893342
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement