Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Exploring the drawings and the evolution of human body diagrams about Zang-Fu organs and meridians].

Created on 19 Oct 2026

Authors

S Y Cui, P Liu

Published in

Zhonghua yi shi za zhi (Beijing, China : 1980). Volume 56. Issue 5. Pages 278-284. Sep 28, 2026.

Abstract

Human body diagrams of Zang-Fu organs and meridians are believed to be vehicles to visualise traditional Chinese medicine theories. Their drawing methods and content evolution indicate the interaction among anatomical knowledge, medical theories, and cultural cognition. This paper examined Chan Jing, Tong Ren Shu Xue Zhen Jiu Tu Jing, Cun Zhen Huan Zhong Tu, and Shang Han Lun Da Fang Tu Jie and explored their evolution process. It was found that the diagrams in Chan Jing focused on the "theory of fetal nourishment", influenced by the Five Elements theory and the concept of the interaction between heaven and humanity in the Han Dynasty. The diagrams in Tong Ren Shu Xue Zhen Jiu Tu Jing centered on the theory of meridians and explained acupuncture taboos with Zang-Fu organ metaphors. Cun Zhen Huan Zhong Tu was drawn based on execution of ground autopsies but revised according to classical texts. Shang Han Lun Da Fang Tu Jie, however, is oriented toward the application of formulas, with its illustrations rendered in a simplified and schematic manner. In the late Qing Dynasty, influenced by Western medical atlases, the illustrative style of traditional Chinese visceral diagrams shifted, and anatomical-style visceral diagrams became mainstream.. This study uncovered the characteristics of these diagrams. They preferred theoretical explication to morphological depiction, and constructed the underlying drawing rationale guided by interpreting classical traditional Chinese medicine texts and combining anatomical knowledge, providing new perspectives for understanding traditional Chinese medicine theories.

PMID:
42893925
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement