Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Functional disability, diabetes and hypertension among adults in the United States, August 2021-August 2023.

Created on 19 Oct 2026

Authors

Ying Liu, Piaopiao Chen, Yanmei Su, Juan Xie, Weiquan Zeng, Chun Pan

Published in

Preventive medicine reports. Volume 71. Pages 103664. Epub Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

To describe diabetes and hypertension prevalence, diagnosis status and measured-threshold outcomes by functional disability.
We analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted in the United States during August 2021-August 2023. Adults aged 18 years or older were classified using six Washington Group functioning domains. Outcome-specific weights and direct age standardization were used. Disability-minus-no-disability differences and 95% confidence intervals accounted for the complex survey design.
Among 8101 adults with complete functioning data, total diabetes and hypertension were classifiable in 5974 and 6172. Standardized total-disease differences were 9.3 percentage points (5.8, 12.7) for diabetes and 8.3 (3.1, 13.6) for hypertension. Undiagnosed-disease differences among eligible adults were 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7) and -3.4 (-7.2, 0.5), respectively. Among hypertension cases with known diagnosis status, the undiagnosed fraction was lower with disability: -14.1 (-19.9, -8.3). Conditional diabetes estimates were imprecise and sensitive to sparse younger-age cells.
Adults with functional disability had higher standardized total diabetes and hypertension prevalence. Diagnosis-status and measured-threshold findings depended on the condition and denominator; they do not establish equivalent care or explain the origins of prevalence differences.

PMID:
42894838
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement