Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association of HPA Genotypes w ith Platelet Apheresis Donation Frequency and Yield Among Chinese Donors: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Created on 19 Oct 2026

Authors

Weiwei Fang, Fengliang Lu, Xin Li, Meng Wang, Xiying Li

Published in

Journal of blood medicine. Volume 17. Pages 637147. Epub Oct 14, 2026.

Abstract

Human platelet antigens (HPA) are clinically significant in transfusion refractoriness, but whether HPA genotypes are associated with cumulative donation frequency or apheresis yield remains unknown.
We genotyped 1,242 platelet apheresis donors from Harbin, China for eight HPA systems (HPA-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -15, and -21). Outcomes were cumulative donation count and index yield (0.5/1/2 units). Univariate analyses used Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Multivariable negative binomial and binary logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex, ABO, and ethnicity. Sensitivity analyses excluded first-time donors, stratified by age, and removed the top 5% of donors.
HPA-3 and HPA-15 were the most polymorphic (b-allele frequencies: 42.0% and 44.5%). However, neither HPA-3 nor HPA-15 was significantly associated with cumulative donation count in multivariable negative binomial regression (HPA-15 ab vs aa+bb: IRR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.90-1.15, P=0.79; HPA-3 b carrier vs aa: IRR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1.10, P=0.66). Similarly, no significant association was found between HPA-15 b carrier status and apheresis yield (OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.76-1.25, P=0.83). These null findings remained consistent across all sensitivity analyses.
In this cohort of northern Chinese Han platelet apheresis donors, HPA genotypes-including the polymorphic HPA-3 and HPA-15 systems-were not significantly associated with donation frequency or apheresis yield.

PMID:
42894787
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement