Multivariable Mendelian Randomization With Weak Instruments: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Methods.

Authors

Andrew J Grant, Ashish Patel, Stephen Burgess

Published in

Statistics in medicine. Volume 45. Issue 23-24. Pages e70788.

Abstract

Weak instruments are a well-known limitation for valid causal inference in Mendelian randomization studies. In the single exposure setting, weak instrument bias can be mitigated by selecting genetic instruments which are strongly associated with the exposure according to p-value and/or F-statistic thresholds. However, in the multi-exposure setting, genetic instruments may be strongly associated with an exposure but weakly associated with it conditional on all other exposures in the analysis. It is therefore more difficult to guarantee conditionally strong instruments in multivariable Mendelian randomization. Weak instrument bias can be mitigated using modeling approaches; however, there are fewer methods for doing this in the multivariable case compared with the single exposure case. In this paper, we consider a method for mitigating weak instrument bias in multivariable Mendelian randomization using a Bayesian framework: MVMR-Pony. We compare this method with existing frequentist methods. We show using simulation studies that the MVMR-Pony method outperforms the frequentist approaches with respect to bias, coverage, Type I error rates, and power, across settings where weak instrument bias arises due to correlated genetic effects, measurement error, and mediation.

PMID:
42894289
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.