Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Potassium-Concentration-Gated C-N Coupling Enables a Volcano-Shaped Selectivity Window for Electrocatalytic Urea Synthesis.

Created on 19 Oct 2026

Authors

Yuxing Lin, Yifan Zhou, Jiaqi Sang, Bihao Hu, Jikai Sun, Chao Yang, Yuhua Wen, Lei Wang, Pengfei Ou

Published in

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English). Pages e4817510. Oct 19, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.

Abstract

Alkali metal cations influence electrochemical interfaces, but their role in regulating urea electrosynthesis remains incompletely understood. Here, we combine constant-potential ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD), classical molecular dynamics (cMD), flow-cell electrolysis, and in situ infrared spectroscopy to investigate how cations affect urea formation from CO2 and nitrate on Cu. Among Li+, Na+, K+, and Cs+, K+ affords the lowest calculated barrier for direct *CO-*NO coupling and the highest measured urea Faradaic efficiency. Varying the K+ concentration reveals a volcano-shaped dependence of urea activity and selectivity, with a maximum at a partial current density of 13.62 mA cm-2 and Faradaic efficiency of 24.50% near 1.20 M K+. AIMD calculations identify a minimum coupling barrier at an intermediate nominal K+ concentration and elucidate how K+ concentration regulates precursor geometry and charge redistribution. Complementary cMD simulations reveal concentration-dependent changes in interfacial reactant distributions and water structure, with infrared spectral features providing experimental evidence of changes in interfacial reaction chemistry. Together, these results establish an optimal K+ concentration window governed by the coupled roles of elementary-step kinetics and electrolyte organization in urea electrosynthesis.

PMID:
42895356
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 26
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement