Correction to"Applying multivariate generalizability theory to psychological assessments" by Vispoel et al. (2023).

Published in

Psychological methods. Volume 31. Issue 5. Pages iii.

Abstract

Reports an error in "Applying multivariate generalizability theory to psychological assessments" by Walter P. Vispoel, Hyeryung Lee, Hyeri Hong and Tingting Chen (Psychological Methods, Advanced Online Publication, Sep 07, 2023, np; see record 2024-05048-001). In the article "Applying Multivariate Generalizability Theory to Psychological Assessments," by Walter P. Vispoel, Hyeryung Lee, Hyeri Hong, and Tingting Chen (Psychological Methods, advance online publication, September 7, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000606), the author discovered an error in Equation 38. "Estimated Reliability (Composite)" should have been "Estimated Reliability (Subscale)" in the denominator of the original equation. This change was incorporated into the corrected version, and the equation was further simplified by replacing terms involving true score variances and covariances. The corrected equation is noted in this Erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2024-05048-001.) Multivariate generalizability theory (GT) represents a comprehensive framework for quantifying score consistency, separating multiple sources contributing to measurement error, correcting correlation coefficients for such error, assessing subscale viability, and determining the best ways to change measurement procedures at different levels of score aggregation. Despite such desirable attributes, multivariate GT has rarely been applied when measuring psychological constructs and far less often than univariate techniques that are subsumed within that framework. Our purpose in this tutorial is to describe multivariate GT in a simple way and illustrate how it expands and complements univariate procedures. We begin with a review of univariate GT designs and illustrate how such designs serve as subcomponents of corresponding multivariate designs. Our empirical examples focus primarily on subscale and composite scores for objectively scored measures, but guidelines are provided for applying the same techniques to subjectively scored performance and clinical assessments. We also compare multivariate GT indices of score consistency and measurement error to those obtained using alternative GT-based procedures and across different software packages for analyzing multivariate GT designs. Our online supplemental materials include instruction, code, and output for common multivariate GT designs analyzed using mGENOVA and the gtheory, glmmTMB, lavaan, and related packages in R. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

PMID:
42895498
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.