Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Tailoring Reactivity of Molecular Gallium Hydroxides via Chalcogen Bridging.

Created on 19 Oct 2026

Authors

Erandi Bernabé-Pablo, Alfonso Gallardo-Garibay, Vojtech Jancik, Diego Martínez-Otero, Roman Neufeld, Uvaldo Hernández-Balderas, Dietmar Stalke, Mónica Moya-Cabrera

Published in

Inorganic chemistry. Volume 65. Issue 41. Pages 24295-24307. Oct 19, 2026.

Abstract

We studied the influence of bridging chalcogen atoms (μ-E; E = S, Se) on the structure and reactivity of digallium dihydroxide complexes [{MeLGa(OH)}2(μ-E)] [E = S (4), Se (5); MeL = CH{CMe(NAr)}2-, Ar = 2,4,6-Me3C6H2]. Compounds 4 and 5 were synthesized from MeLGaCl2 and sodium chalcogenide (Na2E) in THF-NH3(l), followed by controlled hydrolysis. For the sulfur system, the intermediates [{MeLGa(Cl)}2(μ-S)] (2) and [{MeLGa(NH2)}2(μ-S)] (3) were isolated and characterized, whereas the corresponding selenium derivatives proved too reactive for isolation. The reactivity of 4 and 5 toward Group 4 metal amides, M(NR2)4 (M = Ti, R = Me; M = Zr, Hf, R = Et), revealed a chalcogen effect, affording both monocyclic and spirocyclic complexes from 4, while 5 selectively yielded spirocyclic complexes. Likewise, the milder amide Me2Si(NMe2)2 reacted exclusively with 5 to produce a siloxide-bridged derivative. Distinct borane-dependent pathways were also observed. Treatment of 4 and 5 with BH3·THF resulted in the Ga-OH protonolysis to form cyclic borates, whereas BH3·SMe2 promoted hydride attack at gallium, yielding gallium hydrides. These results provide an insight into the ambiphilic character of 4 and 5 and establish chalcogen bridging as a strategy for tuning their bonding and reactivity.

PMID:
42895374
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement