Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Pollution characteristics, source analysis and risk assessment of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances of Kui River.

Created on 19 Oct 2026

Authors

Shilong Wu, LuCheng Zhang, Yi She, Gang Kang, Xuemo Liu, ZiHui Xu, TingWei Huai, Rong Li, Lin Qi, MingQing Zhang

Published in

Environmental toxicology and chemistry. Oct 19, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.

Abstract

To investigate the pollution distribution characteristics and ecological risk levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the surface water of the Kui River, this study tested 17 PFAS in the surface water and analyzed their pollution levels in the local aquatic environment. Results showed PFAS were ubiquitous in the Kui River, with ΣPFAS concentrations ranging from 241.83 to 700.09 ng·L-1. The main pollutants were perfluorobutyric acid (PFBA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), with average concentrations of 124.62, 127.26, and 188.47 ng·L-1, respectively. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) composition had distinct seasonal variations: PFBA dominated in the wet season, while PFOA prevailed in the dry season. Principal component analysis indicated PFAS pollution mainly originated from food packaging, surfactant production, plastics, and metal plating/textiles. Ecological risk assessment showed most PFAS posed low risks; only PFOA had low risk at all dry-season sampling sites, and mixture Risk Quotient (RQmix) posed a general low-level risk. Health risk assessment found Hazard Quotient (HQ) values of seven PFAS for all age groups ranged from 1.36E-4 to 0.247. PFOA exposure had HQ > 0.1 (low hazard), while the other six showed no significant hazard. However, HQmix exceeded 0.1 for all four age groups, indicating adverse health effects. Future attention should focus on the management of dynamic PFAS sources and the combined risk posed by PFAS mixtures in the Kui River.

PMID:
42895294
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement