Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Prophylactic IFN-γ blockade drives axi-cel expansion without preventing refractory toxicities: caution against pre-emptive use.

Created on 20 Oct 2026

Authors

Viktoria Blumenberg, David J Bozym, Maxx King, Marisa G Ogier, Deshea L Harris, Keshav Sridharan, Jing Li, Patrick C Johnson, Benjamin R Puliafito, Alexandra M Haugh, Jacob D Soumerai, Julie E Haydu, Elliot C Woods, Jeremy S Abramson, Yi-Bin Chen, Mark B Leick, Kathleen Me Gallagher, Marcela V Maus, Matthew J Frigault

Published in

Blood cancer discovery. Oct 19, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.

Abstract

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) affect most patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Based on pre-clinical data, we hypothesized that prophylactic IFN-γ blockade could prevent toxicity without impairing efficacy. We initiated an open-label phase 2 trial (NCT06550141) evaluating single-dose emapalumab one day before axi-cel. Here, we report the first two patients to caution against the pre-emptive emapalumab use prior axi-cel: Both developed treatment-refractory toxicities including high-grade ICANS and overlapping CRS-IEC-HS requiring multiple immunomodulatory agents. CAR T-cell expansion exceeded levels reported in ZUMA-1 and a standard-of-care axi-cel cohort at our institution. Despite therapeutic emapalumab and suppressed free IFN-γ, IL-2 and sIL-2R were markedly elevated, suggesting CRS was driven independent of IFN-γ. Both patients achieved complete responses, suggesting preserved efficacy. Given the unanticipated severity and refractoriness of toxicities, recruitment with this design was discontinued and the protocol was amended.

PMID:
42896102
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement