Comparative efficacy of interventions for preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors

Kansak Boonpattharatthiti, Suwapat Lawin, Pongsapat Limhengsin, Teerapon Dhippayom, Kwanjit Danwilai

Published in

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. Volume 34. Issue 11. Oct 19, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) negatively affects patients' appearance and emotional well-being. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of different preventive interventions for CIA.
We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Dissertations from inception to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions to prevent CIA in cancer patients and reporting hair preservation outcomes (as defined by individual trials, including CTCAE grade < 2, < 30 to < 50% hair loss, or WHO grade 0-2) were included. Scalp hypothermia was divided into three groups based on duration post-chemotherapy: short (0-45 min), traditional (46-90 min), and prolonged (> 90 min). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Interventions were ranked with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), and certainty of evidence was evaluated using CINeMA.
Of 6696 articles identified, 12 (n = 736) evaluating nine interventions (three scalp hypothermia durations, scalp compression, four pharmacological agents, and usual care) were included. Network meta-analysis indicated that prolonged-scalp hypothermia significantly improved hair preservation compared with usual care (RR = 24.66; 95%CI = 7.07-86.05; low certainty of evidence) and traditional scalp hypothermia (RR = 2.13; 95%CI = 1.15-3.93; very low certainty of evidence), and pharmacological agents (RRs ranging from 14.06 to 23.83; low certainty). However, prolonged-scalp hypothermia tended to show better hair preservation than short duration, though not statistically significant (RR = 2.06, 95%CI = 0.78-5.39). Based on SUCRA, prolonged-scalp hypothermia (97.0%) had the highest ranking, followed by short scalp hypothermia (78.6%) and traditional scalp hypothermia (76.8%). Most studies were rated as having high risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was graded as low to very low.
Current low certainty evidence suggests that scalp hypothermia could prevent CIA. Prolonged-scalp hypothermia provides a higher degree of protection, whereas a short duration demonstrates a weaker protective effect. However, this difference was not statistically significant.
This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251103932) and can be accessed via the following link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251103932 .

PMID:
42895661
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.