Authors
Yen Teng Hsu, Wei Chieh Tseng, Ying Lun Hsu, Mei Hwan Wu, Chun Wei Lu, Kun Lang Wu, Wei Feng Peng, Shuenn Nan Chiu
Published in
JAMA pediatrics. Oct 19, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.
Abstract
The diagnostic efficacy of different ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring modalities in this patient population remains unclear.
To compare the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of 3 ambulatory electrocardiographic modalities in pediatric patients.
This single-center study took place at an outpatient clinic and an inpatient ward of National Taiwan University Children's Hospital. Patients younger than 18 years who underwent ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring between December 2022 and January 2025 were included. These data were analyzed February 2025 to March 2026.
A continuous 7-day Holter device that functioned as an event recorder was used. Recordings from the first 24 hours were defined as the 24-hour Holter results.
Arrhythmias were categorized as major (tachyarrhythmia or bradyarrhythmia) or minor (extrasystolic arrhythmia). All patients were followed up for 1 year; the final arrhythmia diagnosis was used as the reference standard. The primary and secondary outcomes were detection of arrhythmia and a change in clinical management attributable to monitoring findings, respectively.
In total, 435 children (235 female [54%] and 200 male [46%]; mean [SD] age, 12.3 [3.9] years) were included. The mean (SD) duration of analyzable ambulatory electrocardiographic data was 4.9 (1.7) days. Of 411 children who activated the event recorder, 10.7% had symptom-correlated arrhythmias. The 7-day Holter monitoring demonstrated a significantly higher rate of major arrhythmias (6.2%) than the 24-hour Holter or 7-day event recordings (2.3%; rate difference 95% CI, 1.9%-6.0%; P < .001). Seven-day Holter monitoring showed superior sensitivity (7-day Holter monitoring: 73%; rate difference 95% CI, 54.1%-84.6%; 24-hour Holter monitoring: 27%; rate difference 95% CI, 13.4%-43.1%; and 7-day event recorder: 27%, rate difference 95% CI, 13.4%-43.1%; P < .001) and a high negative predictive value (97.5%, 95% CI, 95.2%-98.6%). Tachyarrhythmias were associated with higher rates of management changes; management changed in 7.1% of patients with 7-day Holter monitoring, 1.6% with 24-hour Holter (rate difference 95% CI, 3.0%-7.6%; P < .001) and 2.8% with a 7-day event recorder (rate difference 95% CI, 2.0%-6.2%; P < .001).
In this study of pediatric patients without structural heart disease who underwent electrocardiographic monitoring, 7-day continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring was associated with a significantly higher diagnostic yield than 24-hour Holter and 7-day event recording. Continuous monitoring may be preferred to detect tachyarrhythmias likely to influence clinical management.
PMID:
42895727
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 19
- Comments 0