Examining the Association Between Shift Length, Fatigue, and Perceived Safety in NNP Practice.

Authors

Jacqueline Hoffman, Meredith Farmer, Jordan Pelkmans, Tracey R Bell

Published in

Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. Oct 19, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.

Abstract

Neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) often work extended shifts to support continuity of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Prolonged shift length has been associated with fatigue and safety risks in other healthcare populations; however, evidence specific to NNP practice remains limited.
The purpose was to examine associations between shift length, self-reported fatigue, and safety-related outcomes among NNPs, and to evaluate how these outcomes vary by demographic and practice characteristics.
This cross-sectional survey examined shift characteristics, self-reported fatigue, and safety-related outcomes among board-certified NNPs. Using a national certification mailing list, 6717 NNPs were invited; 623 initiated the survey, with analytic sample size varying by item. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression.
More than half of respondents (n = 190, 51%) preferred 24-hour shifts despite reporting fatigue-related concerns. Most respondents (n = 435, 85%) reported that unit census and acuity influence fatigue. Nearly half (49%) reported feeling unsafe to drive home at least once after working an extended shift (>16 hours). Years of experience, rather than age, were associated with fewer reported safety concerns. Safety perceptions varied by NICU level, with less experienced NNPs reporting greater impairment.
Fatigue-related safety concerns varied by NICU level and clinical experience, while most respondents continued to prefer 24-hour shifts despite these concerns. These findings highlight the tension between workforce sustainability, provider preference, and safety within neonatal practice.

PMID:
42896080
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.