Authors
Audrey R Byrne, Nana O Sarpong
Published in
JBJS reviews. Volume 14. Issue 10. Oct 01, 2026. Epub Oct 19, 2026.
Abstract
Technical performance alone does not establish clinical readiness; strong accuracy or discrimination does not demonstrate that an artificial intelligence (AI) tool will generalize, improve clinical care, or remain safe after deployment. Existing AI frameworks provide important guidance for reporting, risk of bias, model evaluation, and clinical trials, but they do not provide a single longitudinal stage describing a technology's progression from development through monitored clinical deployment. We propose the Orthopaedic Surgery Clinical AI Readiness (OSCAR) scale as a 6-stage conceptual framework spanning model development, internal and external validation, early clinical evaluation, comparative clinical validation, and monitored deployment. Illustrative applications of OSCAR demonstrate how technically strong models may remain at stage 1, external validation advances a tool to stage 2, live workflow evaluation represents stage 3, and comparative clinical evidence is required for stage 4. OSCAR is intended to complement, not replace, established reporting and risk-of-bias standards. The framework remains unvalidated and requires stakeholder consensus, explicit decision criteria, inter-rater reliability testing, and prospective evaluation.
PMID:
42896012
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 3
- Comments 0