Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparative Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Nursing Interventions in Patients With Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Created on 20 Oct 2026

Authors

Rongrong Lai, Lingyun Jin, Shuoshuo Chen, Ruru Li, Miao Wang, Liqing Zhang

Published in

Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS. Volume 23. Issue 4. Pages e70084.

Abstract

To compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions integrated into nursing care on swallowing function and safety in patients with post-stroke dysphagia.
We searched Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, CINAHL, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating rehabilitation nursing interventions for patients with post-stroke dysphagia, from database inception to September 2025. The primary outcomes were the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), while secondary outcomes included the Videofluoroscopic Dysphagia Scale (VDS) and the Swallowing Quality of Life Scale (SWAL-QOL).
Seventeen RCTs were included. Rehabilitation nursing interventions were more effective than conventional care in improving FOIS, PAS, and VDS. For FOIS, kinesiology taping (KT) combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 78.7%, mean rank = 2.7) and respiratory muscle training (RMT) (SUCRA = 78.1%, mean rank = 2.9) ranked highest. For PAS, KT combined with NMES (SUCRA = 95.9%, mean rank = 1.3) and KT (SUCRA = 84.1%, mean rank = 2.1) ranked highest.
Rehabilitation nursing interventions may improve swallowing function and safety in patients with post-stroke dysphagia. RMT, KT, and KT + NMES showed potential benefits for different aspects of swallowing recovery. However, the superiority of KT + NMES requires confirmation in high-quality multicenter RCTs with head-to-head comparisons and long-term follow-up.
PROSPERO ID: CRD420251155222.

PMID:
42896962
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 25
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement