Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Excess Liver Fat in Type 2 Diabetes Stratified by Intrapancreatic Fat Deposition: A Meta-Analysis of Dual-Organ MRI Studies.

Created on 20 Oct 2026

Authors

Hyun Hee Sul, Saeed Ahmad, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Matheus Souza, Maxim S Petrov

Published in

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver. Volume 46. Issue 11. Pages e70934.

Abstract

Both liver fat content (LFC) and intrapancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) are frequently increased in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We meta-analysed dual-organ MRI studies comparing LFC between individuals with T2DM and non-diabetic controls and explored whether study-level differences in LFC varied according to IPFD burden. Seventeen studies (2142 participants) were included. Individuals with T2DM had significantly higher LFC than non-diabetic controls (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.89, 95% CI 0.60-1.18). In exploratory subgroup analyses, liver fat excess was larger in studies with mean IPFD ≥ 10% than in those with IPFD < 10% (SMD 1.20 vs. 0.62; p = 0.04), though this finding was not consistently retained in leave-one-out analyses. Alternative IPFD cutoffs yielded directionally similar but non-significant subgroup differences. Study-level differences in IPFD were associated with differences in LFC (β = 0.383, p = 0.006) in univariable meta-regression, but not after BMI adjustment. These findings suggest that higher IPFD is associated with greater liver fat excess in T2DM at the study level. Individual-level analyses are now warranted to clarify this relationship.

PMID:
42897902
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement