Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Interaction of lifeguard (LFG/FAIM2) with phosphoinositides is associated with altered intracellular calcium homeostasis in breast cancer cells.

Created on 20 Oct 2026

Authors

Anna Marie Welzel, Lena Maria Herrmann, Nadjib Dastagir, Sarah Strauß, Peter M Vogt, Vesna Bucan

Published in

Biochemistry and biophysics reports. Volume 48. Pages 102830. Epub Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

Lifeguard (LFG/FAIM2) is an anti-apoptotic transmembrane protein implicated in apoptosis resistance and breast cancer progression. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying its biological function remain incompletely understood. In the present study, we investigated potential interactions between LFG and phosphoinositides in the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Using membrane lipid strip and phosphoinositide (PIP) array assays, we observed binding signals between LFG and several phosphoinositide species, indicating potential lipid-binding preferences under the experimental conditions employed. Because phosphoinositides participate in intracellular calcium signaling pathways, we next examined whether reduced LFG expression was associated with alterations in intracellular calcium homeostasis. Using a fluorescence-based calcium assay, we found that siRNA-mediated downregulation of LFG was associated with increased intracellular calcium-associated fluorescence. Overall, our exploratory findings suggest that LFG may participate in phosphoinositide-associated signaling and intracellular calcium homeostasis in the breast cancer cell model examined. Further studies will be required to validate these observations, determine the underlying molecular mechanisms, and assess their potential relevance for apoptosis regulation and breast cancer progression.

PMID:
42898335
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement