Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Indications, procedural standards, and training requirements for flexible nasolaryngoscopy in pulmonology - a Delphi study protocol.

Created on 20 Oct 2026

Authors

Ajit Nair, Philip G Bardin, Paul Leong

Published in

MethodsX. Volume 17. Pages 104191. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

Flexible nasolaryngoscopy (FNL) is a well-established, minimally invasive procedure for assessing the nasal passages, nasopharynx, and larynx. Its role in pulmonology is expanding, particularly for evaluating vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction, chronic cough, and other upper airway conditions relevant to the "united airways" model of care. However, no consensus-based guidance currently exists on the indications, procedural standards, or training requirements for FNL performed by pulmonologists. This protocol describes a modified two-round Delphi study that will survey an international, purposively sampled panel of pulmonologists and otolaryngologists via an online platform hosted by Monash University, using a five-point Likert scale and pre-specified consensus thresholds (≥70% agreement). Findings will be discussed in a structured expert roundtable to support interpretation and contextualization. • Establishes expert consensus on clinical indications and contraindications for FNL in pulmonology practice. • Develops consensus on procedural standards, curriculum, and competency requirements for FNL training in pulmonology. • Identifies priority areas for future research to support integration of FNL into pulmonology services.

PMID:
42898552
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 28
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement