Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Molecular basis for discrimination of cGAMP linkage isomers by a c-di-GMP-II riboswitch variant.

Created on 21 Oct 2026

Authors

Xiaochen Xu, Wang Cheng, Huiqin You, Zejia Hu, Xinyue Bao, Hongcheng Li, Jinzhu Zhang, Dinshaw J Patel, Aiming Ren

Published in

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Volume 123. Issue 43. Pages e2621568123. Oct 27, 2026. Epub Oct 20, 2026.

Abstract

Riboswitches are noncoding RNA regulatory motifs predominantly found in bacteria. Signaling molecules such as c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, and 3',3'-cGAMP have been reported to be recognized by riboswitches. In contrast, 2',3'-cGAMP functions as a second messenger in mammalian cells, yet its interaction with RNA molecules remains unclear. Here, we report the crystal structures of a c-di-GMP-II riboswitch variant, c-di-GMP-II-Bh, bound to 2',3'-cGAMP and 3',3'-cGAMP. Both complexes adopt a similar overall RNA scaffold with an identical binding pocket composition. However, the ligand bases adopt inverted orientations in the binding pocket, resulting in distinct interaction patterns with residues A64 and G68 and differences in base-pair stacking against the phosphodiester backbone. Structural comparison together with ligand-binding assays of structure-guided mutants using isothermal titration calorimetry reveals the molecular principles by which an RNA riboswitch discriminates among cyclic dinucleotide linkage isomers, highlighting the remarkable sensitivity of RNA binding pockets to subtle ligand structural variations and provides a mechanistic framework for understanding ligand specificity in RNA-small molecule recognition.

PMID:
42900726
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement