Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Risk Stratification Score for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors

Laura Castro-Labrador, Rafael Zamora, Sergio Szyldergemajn, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo Izquierdo, José A De All, Juan M Domínguez, Carlos M Galmarini

Published in

JCO clinical cancer informatics. Volume 10. Issue 4. Pages e2600054. Epub Oct 20, 2026.

Abstract

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) shows marked clinical heterogeneity and poor long-term survival, highlighting the need for simple and reliable risk stratification tools beyond the limited usability of existing complex prognostic models. In this study, we developed and validated PROGRESS (Prostate Cancer Global Risk Evaluation and Stratification Score), a simplified prognostic score derived through machine learning‑guided feature selection distilled into a simple laboratory-based tool.
Baseline data from 2,035 patients with mCRPC (training set) were embedded into synthetic representations, reduced with UMAP, and clustered with DBSCAN to discover outcome-related subpopulations. Feature contribution analysis informed a multivariable model that yielded three independent predictors (prostate specific antigen [PSA], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], and AST) composing PROGRESS. External validation used two independent data sets (n = 1,239) across different therapeutic settings. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression; discrimination was assessed by ROC-AUC, AUC(t), and Harrel C-index.
Unsupervised modeling identified two patient risk subpopulations with significantly different OS rates (median 27.4 v 17.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 2.20 [95% CI, 1.91 to 2.54]; P < .00001). The three retained predictors (PSA, ALP, and AST) were combined into a composite score (PROGRESS) that showed strong discrimination in the training cohort (ROC-AUC 0.89; AUC(t) 0.60; Harrel C-index 0.69). Using a prespecified cutoff, patients classified by PROGRESS as increased risk had significantly shorter survival than low-risk patients (median 18.3 v 25.6 months; HR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.50 to 1.97]; P < .0001). PROGRESS prognostic performance was consistent across all validation cohorts (all P < .0001).
By combining ML-based pattern discovery with classical modeling, PROGRESS provides a simple, objective, and readily implementable prognostic tool using three inexpensive routine laboratory measures. Its consistent performance across independent data sets supports clinical utility for individual risk stratification, trial enrichment, and early decision making. Prospective real-world validation is warranted.

PMID:
42900858
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.