Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Vibostolimab Coformulated with Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Created on 21 Oct 2026

Authors

Jacob Sands, Shun Lu, Joachim G Aerts, Martin Reck, Alejandro Navarro, Talia Shentzer Kutiel, Nir Peled, Ignacio Casarini, Samuel J Kerr, Toshiaki Takahashi, Ahmet Bilici, Ying Cheng, Mengzhao Wang, Shin Yup Lee, Anna Łowczak, Julien Mazieres, Haixia Hu, Jianyu Wu, Himani Aggarwal, Hazem El-Osta, Luis Paz-Ares

Published in

Targeted oncology. Oct 20, 2026. Epub Oct 20, 2026.

Abstract

Vibostolimab, an anti-T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) antibody, showed antitumor activity with pembrolizumab in non-small-cell lung cancer.
The KEYVIBE-008 study evaluated vibostolimab coformulated with pembrolizumab (vibostolimab/pembrolizumab) plus etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy (EP) versus atezolizumab plus EP as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Participants aged ≥18 years with untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer were randomized 1:1 to vibostolimab/pembrolizumab (200 mg each) or atezolizumab (1200 mg) every 3 weeks, with EP and cisplatin/carboplatin for the first four cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The prespecified interim analysis included a non-binding futility analysis of overall survival (futility threshold for actual number of events, P = 0.4816).
Four hundred and sixty participants were randomized (both arms, n = 230). Median time from randomization to data cutoff (4 June, 2024) was 16.6 (range 11.3‒26.1) months. The prespecified futility criterion for overall survival was met (hazard ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.00‒1.59; P = 0.9762). There was no difference in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.82‒1.23) or objective response rates (71.7% with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab vs 74.8% with atezolizumab). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66.8% of participants treated with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab and 57.2% treated with atezolizumab. Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 39.3% and 29.7% of participants, respectively.
In this interim analysis of vibostolimab/pembrolizumab plus EP versus atezolizumab plus EP as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, the prespecified futility criterion for overall survival was met. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events and immune-mediated adverse events were more frequent with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab versus atezolizumab. Given the overall benefit/risk profile, treatment with vibostolimab/pembrolizumab was discontinued.
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05224141.

PMID:
42900351
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement