Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease Progression: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Created on 21 Oct 2026

Authors

Hyun Woo Lee, Seungyeon Kim, Byoung Seok Ye, Yun Mi Yu

Published in

Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. Volume 139. Issue 5. Pages e70323.

Abstract

We investigated the effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) on the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean nationwide claims data to identify patients with AD aged 60-79 years in 2010. ARB users and nonusers were 1:1 propensity score matched. Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated AD progression, defined as memantine initiation and mortality. Active-comparator and dose-response analyses were conducted. ARB use was associated with lower risks of memantine initiation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.89) and mortality (HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.76-0.89). Cumulative exposure analyses showed stronger associations in the highest exposure categories, including 2-3 years of ARB use and ≥ 2 DDD-years, whereas associations in the lower exposure categories were not statistically significant. In active-comparator analyses, ARBs were associated with lower mortality risk than ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, but not with dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs). ARB use may be a reasonable antihypertensive choice in patients with AD, although the comparable outcomes between ARBs and CCBs suggest that these associations may not be unique to ARBs and may instead reflect shared blood pressure-lowering and vascular effects. Further prospective research is warranted to optimize antihypertensive selection in patients with AD.

PMID:
42899358
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement