Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A longer duration of immediate mother-newborn skin-to-skin contact was associated with higher odds of breastfeeding initiation among neonates delivered vaginally.

Created on 21 Oct 2026

Authors

Pi-Hui Chen, Chueh-Yi Huang, Cai-Rong Li, Shih-Chin Chang, Ya-Wen Chang, Chia-Lung Shih

Published in

Pediatrics and neonatology. Oct 07, 2026. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

Immediate mother-newborn skin-to-skin contact (SSC) supports neonatal adaptation and breastfeeding, but the association between SSC duration and breastfeeding outcomes remains unclear.
This retrospective cohort study collected data from vaginally delivered neonates at a regional teaching hospital in Taiwan between 2024 and 2025. Mother-infant dyads were categorized into no SSC, ∼20-min SSC, and ∼60-min SSC groups. Outcomes included breastfeeding initiation before discharge, the duration from the moment of birth to breastfeeding initiation, neonatal body temperature, and newborn center (NBC) admission. Multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate the association between SSC duration and the clinical outcomes.
Among 500 dyads, breastfeeding initiation increased with SSC duration (49.7%, 69.5%, and 85.1%). Adjusted odds were higher in the 20-min (OR 2.40) and 60-min groups (OR 5.76). Longer SSC was associated with a higher likelihood of both earlier and more frequent breastfeeding initiation (p < 0.001), without increased NBC admission.
Longer SSC was associated with higher likelihood of breastfeeding initiation without an increased rate of NBC admission, although transient decreases in neonatal body temperature were observed during SSC.

PMID:
42901824
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement