Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Evolution of neurometabolic frugality in harvester ants.

Created on 21 Oct 2026

Authors

Craig D Perl, Zach N Coto, Robert Johnson, Meredith Johnson, Leland Graber, James Haas, Jane S Waters, James Traniello, Jon F Harrison

Published in

Proceedings. Biological sciences. Volume 293. Issue 2081. Oct 21, 2026.

Abstract

Despite the importance of neurometabolic cost in brain size evolution, quantitative data on brain metabolic rates (MRs) are lacking. We measured ex vivo brain MRs among species of the ant genus Pogonomyrmex to test three hypotheses: (i) more socially complex species have higher brain MRs; (ii) smaller-bodied species have higher brain mass-specific metabolic rates (MSMRs); and (iii) more recently derived species have evolved more metabolically 'frugal' brains. Worker body size and colony size, a proxy for social complexity vary significantly among Pogonomyrmex species and were positively correlated. Species with larger colonies did not have larger brains or higher brain MRs. Species with smaller workers had relatively larger brains and higher brain MSMR: 38% of resting MR was attributable to brain metabolism in species with the smallest workers, compared to 6% in species with the largest workers. We suggest that smaller worker body sizes may require higher brain mass-specific energetic costs to achieve comparable performance by absolutely smaller brains. More derived species had strikingly lower mass-specific brain metabolic costs, suggesting that increases in worker body size have selected for neurometabolic frugality through reductions in brain MSMR.

PMID:
42901520
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement