Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Hospitalized With Localized, Regional, and Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.

Created on 22 Oct 2026

Authors

Andrew G LoPolito, Ted Akhiwu, May Z Gao, Jason Semprini, Tammara L Watts, Trinitia Y Cannon, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters

Published in

Head & neck. Oct 20, 2026. Epub Oct 20, 2026.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication in cancer patients, but data in head and neck cancer (HNC)-particularly distinguishing localized, regional, and metastatic disease-are limited.
Using the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample, we examined adults ≥ 18 years with HNC, excluding patients with another primary malignancy. Metastatic status was categorized as localized, regional, and metastatic. Outcomes included odds of VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), inhospital mortality, and prolonged length of stay (LOS ≥ 7 days). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with these outcomes.
Among 62 032 unweighted (310 160 weighted) admissions, 75.0% had localized HNC, 12.7% had regional HNC, and 12.3% had metastatic HNC; 2.6% had VTE (2.4% localized HNC, 2.3% regional HNC, and 4.1% metastatic HNC). Compared with localized HNC, regional HNC was not associated with increased odds of VTE, PE, or DVT, whereas metastatic HNC was associated with higher adjusted odds of VTE (aOR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.30-1.78), PE (aOR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.32-1.98), and DVT (aOR 1.47; 95% CI: 1.18-1.83). VTE was associated with increased inhospital mortality (aOR 1.98; 95% CI: 1.64-2.40) and prolonged LOS (aOR 2.14; 95% CI: 1.92-2.39).
In hospitalized patients, distant, but not regional, metastatic HNC is associated with higher odds of VTE, and VTE is associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes including increased mortality and prolonged LOS.

PMID:
42902813
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement