Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cerebral Artery Stenosis, Glymphatic Dysfunction, and Cognitive Trajectories: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Created on 23 Oct 2026

Authors

Weizhuang Yuan, Xingyang Niu, Linfang Lan, Xinran Chen

Published in

CNS neuroscience & therapeutics. Volume 32. Issue 10. Pages e71216.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the role of glymphatic dysfunction in the association between stenosis and cognition.
Older adults from a longitudinal cohort underwent magnetic resonance angiography to quantify cerebral artery stenosis burden. Glymphatic function was evaluated using diffusion tensor imaging-analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) and free water in white matter (FW-WM). Global cognitive performance was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). Mediation analyses examined indirect effects, and longitudinal cognitive outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects and Cox proportional hazards models.
Among 346 participants, 87 (25.1%) had at least one stenotic cerebral artery. Stenosis burden was associated with a lower DTI-ALPS index (β = -0.04, p = 0.003) and higher FW-WM (β = 0.01, p = 0.022). Both DTI-ALPS and FW-WM significantly mediated the association between stenosis burden and baseline MMSE, accounting for 13.06%-17.19% of the total effect. In longitudinal analyses, participants with stenosis and impaired glymphatic function had a higher risk of CDR-SB worsening relative to those with stenosis but preserved glymphatic function (hazard ratios 1.35-2.96) and those without stenosis (hazard ratios 3.27-4.70).
These findings suggest that glymphatic dysfunction may contribute to the association between cerebral artery stenosis and cognitive deterioration.

PMID:
42904869
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement