Impacts of grazing on greenhouse gas emissions from high elevation páramo peatlands.

Authors

Moira Hough, Ricardo Jaramillo, Segundo Chimbolema, Esteban Suárez, Rodney A Chimner, Erik A Lilleskov

Published in

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America. Volume 36. Issue 7. Pages e70313.

Abstract

High-elevation Andean peatlands hold particularly deep, dense carbon deposits even among peatlands and are a major regional carbon stock. These peatlands are often used for open-range cattle grazing, which has the potential to destabilize peat carbon stocks, releasing greenhouse gases (GHG) in the form of CO₂ and CH₄. There is currently very little information on the impacts of grazing on undrained or partially drained peatlands. We tested the hypotheses that (1) grazing increases GHG emissions (CO₂ and CH₄) from Andean peatlands in general when measured across a wide range of different vegetation types and water table depths and (2) the magnitude of impact of grazing on CO₂ and CH₄ emissions varies by dominant vegetation type. We conducted a survey of CH₄ and CO₂ fluxes at 31 high-elevation peatlands across Ecuador. We then quantified the influence of environmental parameters (water table depth, vegetation type, and grazing pressure) on GHG emissions. We found that heavier grazing intensities were associated with increased CH₄ emissions and that the effect of grazing on CH₄ emission was largest in areas with high water tables and sedge-dominated vegetation. Grazing in cushion plant-dominated peatlands also increased both gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration, with the net effect of increasing CO₂ release and an overall increase in global warming potential. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that grazing leads to increased GHG emissions from tropical Andean peatlands, with the effect size dependent on vegetation type, degree of drainage, and the intensity of grazing.

PMID:
42904844
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.