Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Application of interpretable deep learning in brain age prediction: a comprehensive review.

Created on 23 Oct 2026

Authors

Ziyue Wang, Hongjian Gao, Lan Lin, Yanxue Li, Xinyu Zhu

Published in

Reviews in the neurosciences. Oct 22, 2026. Epub Oct 22, 2026.

Abstract

Brain age prediction has emerged as a promising approach for characterizing interindividual differences in brain aging. However, the increasing complexity of deep learning models has created a substantial gap between predictive performance and interpretability. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has, therefore, become increasingly important for identifying the neuroanatomical features underlying brain age predictions. This review systematically examines interpretable deep learning approaches for brain age prediction. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect identified 32 eligible studies, which were organized into post-hoc explanation methods and intrinsically interpretable models. We further propose a four-dimensional operational framework encompassing Algorithm Reliability, Robustness and Reproducibility, Biological Validation, and Clinical Utility. The reviewed literature indicates a transition from localized feature attribution toward generative, disentangled, attention-based, and anatomically meaningful representations. However, interpretation remains sensitive to methodological and imaging-related factors, while brain age gap (BAG) is also influenced by age dependency, calibration, reference-population composition, and site heterogeneity. Future research should emphasize standardized evaluation and prospective clinical validation to develop reliable and clinically meaningful brain age biomarkers.

PMID:
42904440
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement