A two-wave longitudinal study of geometry self-efficacy and problem-posing in pre-service mathematics teachers.

Authors

Ozkan Ergene, Busra Caylan-Ergene, Tuğba Türk Kurtça

Published in

BMC psychology. Volume 14. Issue 1. Sep 09, 2026. Epub Sep 09, 2026.

Abstract

Understanding how geometry self-efficacy and problem-posing self-efficacy are related over time is important for informing teacher education programs. While cross-sectional studies have examined these constructs primarily at a single time point, their longitudinal interplay remains underexplored. This study examined the longitudinal and cross-lagged associations between geometry self-efficacy and problem-posing self-efficacy among pre-service mathematics teachers. Using a two-wave cross-lagged panel design, data were collected in October 2021 and May 2025, with final analyses based on a matched sample of 251 participants. Results indicated significant stability in both geometry self-efficacy and problem-posing self-efficacy over time. In addition, problem-posing self-efficacy at Time 1 was positively associated with geometry self-efficacy at Time 2 after accounting for stability over time and the baseline relationship between the two constructs. These findings highlight the interrelated nature of self-efficacy beliefs in mathematics education. This study contributes to the literature by examining whether problem-posing self-efficacy is associated with later geometry self-efficacy. The results demonstrate a prospective association across the four-year teacher education period rather than a direct developmental mechanism. Specifically, higher problem-posing self-efficacy at the beginning of the program was associated with higher geometry self-efficacy at the later time point. However, the long interval also involved many unmeasured educational experiences. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted as evidence of a longitudinal association rather than evidence of a developmental mechanism or intervention effect.

PMID:
42908015
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.