Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Modern time-series and spectral methods for analysing solar and stellar oscillatory signals.

Created on 23 Oct 2026

Authors

Ding Yuan, Song Feng

Published in

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences. Volume 384. Issue 2331. Oct 22, 2026.

Abstract

Time-series analysis plays a central role in understanding oscillatory and wave phenomena in solar and stellar atmospheres. However, astrophysical observations are inherently affected by instrumental noise, non-stationary dynamics and uneven sampling. This review provides a comprehensive overview and comparative analysis of principal methods for detecting and characterizing periodicities in solar and stellar signals. We cover Fourier-transform-based transforms, nonlinear fitting-based methods (Lomb-Scargle periodogram (LSP)), time-frequency methods (wavelet and synchrosqueezed transforms) and adaptive decomposition techniques (empirical mode decomposition (EMD)). Advanced statistical significance tests, including false-alarm probability (FAP), autoregressive (AR) models and Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches, are discussed alongside their practical limitations and misuse risks. Through comparative analysis using synthetic benchmarks, we provide guidelines for selecting methods based on signal stationarity, sampling regularity and noise characteristics. Finally, we outline future directions that integrate Bayesian inference with time-frequency analysis to achieve both statistical rigour and temporal localization in studying non-stationary solar and stellar oscillations. This article is part of the theme issue 'Transferable mechanisms in the oscillatory processes of solar and stellar flares'.

PMID:
42908464
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement