Development and Validation of the 9-item Parkinson's Disease Screening Questionnaire.

Authors

Dallah Yoo, Aryun Kim, Minkyeong Kim, Young Hee Sung, Jung Ho Park, Jinyoung Youn, Jinse Park, Jong-Hun Kim, Sunghye Cho, Daecheol Moon, Tae-Beom Ahn

Published in

Journal of movement disorders. Oct 22, 2026. Epub Oct 22, 2026.

Abstract

We aimed to develop and validate a brief, self-administered questionnaire integrating motor and prodromal non-motor symptoms for screening Parkinson's disease (PD).
We conducted a three-phase study. Phase 1 used a prospectively registered systematic review of 107 studies to generate a 52-item draft. In Phase 2, the draft was refined in 205 participants (122 with early PD and 83 healthy controls) using item-level areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and age- and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regression. Phase 3 validated the 9-item Korean PD Screening Questionnaire (KPDSQ) in an independent cohort (n = 246; 122 PD, 45 essential tremor [ET], and 79 controls), and included a 4-week test-retest reassessment.
The final 9-item KPDSQ comprises seven motor items (rest tremor, shuffling or short-step gait, slow daily activities, decreased arm swing, soft voice, masked face, and freezing of gait) and two non-motor items (hyposmia and dream-enactment behavior). At a cutoff of ≥2, sensitivity was 88.5% and specificity was 92.4% for distinguishing PD from controls (AUC = 0.970; 95% CI, 0.946-0.984; p < 0.001). At ≥3, the KPDSQ distinguished PD from ET (AUC = 0.774; 95% CI, 0.680-0.847; p < 0.001). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.800), test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.921), and scores correlated with MDS-UPDRS Part III scores in patients with PD (Spearman's ρ = 0.330; p < 0.001).
The 9-item KPDSQ is a reliable, clinically valid screening tool combining motor and prodromal non-motor features. Prospective community-based validation is warranted.

PMID:
42908388
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.