Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Dorsal Crypsis and Chemical Defense Jointly Shape Brain Size in Toads.

Created on 23 Oct 2026

Authors

Hong Wu, Lingsen Cao, Long Jin, Wenbo Liao, Yanbo Sun, Zhiyong Yuan, Zhisheng Zhang

Published in

Integrative zoology. Oct 23, 2026. Epub Oct 23, 2026.

Abstract

The cognitive benefits of having a large brain must outweigh its substantial energetic demands for such an organ to evolve. The cognitive buffer hypothesis proposes that large brains facilitate survival in complex environments via flexible behaviors. Because active predator evasion is likely more cognitively demanding than a cryptic lifestyle, we reasoned that the evolution of crypsis could relax selection on brain size. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of dorsal crypsis, ventral crypsis, and granular glands on relative total brain evolution in eight toad species. As predicted, total relative brain size was negatively associated with dorsal crypsis across species, but was not related to either the volume or the count of granular glands. Additionally, because certain brain regions may be specifically involved in predator evasion, we assessed relationships between five major brain region sizes and both dorsal crypsis and granular gland traits. Only the olfactory nerves and telencephalon showed negative associations with dorsal crypsis, whereas optic tectum volume correlated positively with granular gland volume. These regions support complex evasion strategies. Our findings indicate that increased dorsal crypsis relaxes selection on cognitively demanding evasion, leading to smaller brains. Thus, crypsis evolution is a previously underexplored factor in vertebrate brain anatomy evolution.

PMID:
42909454
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement