Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Rivaroxaban prophylaxis and catheter-related thrombosis risk in ambulatory gynecological cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Created on 24 Oct 2026

Authors

Qing Xie, Tianhong Cai, Beier Huang

Published in

Thrombosis journal. Volume 24. Issue 1. Jul 28, 2026. Epub Jul 28, 2026.

Abstract

Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) poses significant risks for gynecologic cancer patients with central venous access devices. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between prophylactic rivaroxaban and catheter-related thrombosis in gynecologic oncology outpatients.
This single-center study at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital (January 2021-June 2025) included 351 gynecologic oncology patients with peripherally inserted central catheters or implantable venous access ports. Primary exposure was rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for ≥ 30 days. Primary outcome was imaging-confirmed catheter-related thrombosis within 180 days. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address confounding.
Among 351 patients (120 rivaroxaban, 231 controls), CRT occurred in 3 (2.5%) versus 42 (18.2%) patients, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.41; p < 0.001). The IPTW analysis confirmed this association (weighted HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.44). Major bleeding rates were 1.7% vs. 0.4% (HR 3.86, 95% CI 0.35-42.75; p = 0.273). Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 6.7% vs. 3.0% (HR 2.23, 95% CI 0.81-6.16; p = 0.121).
In this retrospective cohort study, prophylactic rivaroxaban was associated with lower catheter-related thrombosis incidence in gynecologic cancer patients. These observational findings warrant prospective randomized validation.
Not applicable.

PMID:
42919263
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement