Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Gestational Low Protein Diet Increases the Susceptibility to N-Bis(2-Hydroxypropyl)nitrosamine-Induced Lung Tumors in Female Wistar Rats.

Created on 24 Oct 2026

Authors

Vanessa de Cássia Martins Pires Ferreira, Victor Hugo Carvalho, Patrícia Aline Boer, Luís Fernando Barbisan

Published in

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis. Volume 67. Issue 8-9.

Abstract

This study evaluated the susceptibility to lung and kidney carcinogenesis induced by N-bis(2-hydroxypropyl)nitrosamine (DHPN) in female rats whose dams received a low-protein diet (LPD) during gestation. Pregnant Wistar rats were fed normal protein diet (NPD, 17% protein) or LPD (6% protein). After parturition, all dams were fed NPD until weaning. Then, female offspring were distributed into four groups (NPD, LPD, NPD + DHPN, and LPD + DHPN) and fed NPD. At 6 weeks old, two groups received 0.2% DHPN in drinking water for 4 weeks, and some females were euthanized 24 h after carcinogen stopping, while others were euthanized at Week 26. First, the lung was removed, fixed, histologically processed, and tissue sections were immunohistochemically stained for γ-H2AX. Second, the lung and kidneys were removed, fixed, histologically processed, and hematoxylin-eosin stained tissue sections were obtained for histopathological analysis. Female rats whose dams received LPD developed a higher mean number of pulmonary epithelial cells positive for γ-H2AX (p < 0.005) and bronchioloalveolar hyperplasia and adenomas (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) in the lung compared with their counterparts. LPD did not alter the development of atypical tubule hyperplasia in the kidney. These findings indicated that LPD increased DHPN-induced lung carcinogenesis in female rats.

PMID:
42920348
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 20
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement