Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Knee Flexion and Popliteal Artery Contrast Arrival in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Pilot Analysis of Bolus Tracking Monitoring Data.

Created on 24 Oct 2026

Authors

Masayuki Tokunaga, Masamitsu Suhara, Hiroyuki Nagita, Hiroyuki Saigusa, Keitaro Sakai, Masaki Okada, Yuichi Suzuki, Shiori Amemiya, Toshihiro Hayashi, Katsuyuki Hoshina, Osamu Abe

Published in

Annals of vascular diseases. Volume 19. Issue 1. Epub Oct 20, 2026.

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) symptoms can worsen with knee flexion. We examined whether time-enhancement curve (TEC) analysis of discarded bolus tracking data could detect positional differences in popliteal arrival.
In this secondary analysis of a dedicated research protocol (not routine practice), 22 patients with PAD underwent bilateral lower-extremity CT angiography in extended and flexed positions, at ≈90-degree and at maximum flexion. Arrival time, rise rate, and initial area under the curve (iAUC) were extracted. The flexed and extended limbs were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
At maximum flexion, the flexed limb showed a median arrival delay of +1.5 s (p = 0.0002); the within-subject increase from 90-degree flexion to maximum flexion was significant (+0.5 s; p = 0.018). Exploratory subgroup analysis showed significant delays at both angles in unilateral (contralateral ankle-brachial index ≥0.9; n = 15) but not bilateral PAD (n = 7). The rise rate and iAUC did not differ.
The flexed (affected) limb showed delayed popliteal arrival, which was greater at maximum flexion. Because limb position and disease severity were confounded by design, this association is not evidence of causation. These preliminary findings support the feasibility of bolus tracking-derived TEC analysis and motivate within-limb repeated-measures studies.

PMID:
42920465
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement