Authors
Rongqin Liu, Hui Jiang, Fangying Pang
Published in
Frontiers in psychology. Volume 17. Pages 1939367. Epub Oct 09, 2026.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) hallucinations raise questions about how users respond to unreliable outputs from a technology on which they depend. Drawing on the cognitive-affective components of the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) framework, this study examines the roles of GAI trust, cognitive dissonance, perceived controllability, and frustration in the relationship between perceived hallucinations and GAI dependence, with GAI literacy and self-efficacy as individual-difference moderators. A between-subjects experiment involved 546 participants who viewed the same GAI dialogue labelled as either containing fabricated information or verified as accurate. Participants in the former condition reported lower trust and perceived controllability, greater cognitive dissonance and frustration, and lower dependence scores. In the parallel model, the indirect associations through trust, controllability, and frustration were negative, whereas the indirect association through cognitive dissonance was positive. Higher GAI literacy weakened the positive controllability-dependence association. The remaining moderation hypotheses were not supported under the directional and multiplicity-adjusted criteria. The findings connect users' evaluations of unreliable GAI responses with the difficulties they report in regulating their use. They underscore the importance of examining dependence alongside reliability judgements, cognitive conflict, and emotional reactions when assessing the human consequences of GAI hallucinations.
PMID:
42920621
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 14
- Comments 0