Adjusted Indirect Comparison Between Epcoritamab-R² and Tafasitamab-R² in Relapse/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.

Authors

Leonidas Benetatos, Elisavet Apostolidou, Vasileios Georgoulis, Georgios S Markopoulos, Savvas Dimitriadis, Eleftheria Hatzimichael, Eleni Kapsali

Published in

Hematological oncology. Volume 44. Issue 6.

Abstract

Treatment of relapsed refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL) still remains challenging. Several strategies have been used against R/R FL. Recently, two chemotherapy-free regimens have gained space, epcoritamab-lenalidomide-rituximab (Epco-R²) and tafasitamab-lenalidomide-rituximab (Tafa-R²). Herein, we performed an indirect trial comparison (ITC) between the two regimens using the Bucher method as they both have the common comparator arm R². The ITC between the two study arms showed an overall response rate (ORR; p = 0.020), and complete remission rates (CR; p < 0.0001), in favor of Epco-R². Analysis regarding time to next treatment (TTNT) interval also favored Epco-R² (p = 0.0011). The ITC in the progression free survival (PFS) context showed the anchored comparison favored Epco-R² over Tafa-R² [HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.31-0.86)], p = 0.011, a finding more pronounced in patients with progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) negativity. Regarding the safety profile, Epco-R² was associated with more hematological toxicity and infections, whereas, Tafa-R² was associated with more COVID-19 infections probably reflecting the pandemic era enrollment timing. In conclusion, Epco-R² is more effective in terms of treatment outcomes, but comes with greater toxicity. Tafa-R² seems more suitable for patients with limited bone marrow reserves, patients who wish to avoid hospitalization, patients at a higher risk for cytokine release syndrome, and patients with high-risk infection vulnerability. Finally, this is not a direct comparison of two therapeutic regimens and the results should be cautiously interpreted. Treatment choice should be decided on a case-by-case scenario based on several different variables.

PMID:
42925502
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.