Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A comparison of health care utilization among insured working-age adults in the state of Virginia, U.S. by long COVID and disabling condition status in 2022.

Created on 25 Oct 2026

Authors

Erica-Lyn Plante, Debra L Brucker

Published in

Preventive medicine reports. Volume 71. Pages 103657. Epub Oct 08, 2026.

Abstract

Americans with disabilities experience more medical interactions and greater access barriers than those without. After the COVID-19 pandemic, Long COVID (LCOVID) emerged as a chronic condition. Few studies examine patterns among people with disabling conditions who develop LCOVID. This study compared healthcare utilization rates among individuals with and without LCOVID and/or a potentially disabling condition (PDC) among working-age adults in Virginia's insurance plans in 2022.
Retrospective analysis using 2021-22 administrative claims data from Virginia's All-Payer Claims Database estimated rates of primary, emergency, and inpatient care among adults aged 18-64 with PDC(s) and LCOVID. Disabling conditions were identified using specifications from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and LCOVID was identified using the ICD-10 code U09.9. Members were grouped by PDC/LCOVID status, sex and age. We applied regression models to estimate rates and compare differences across diagnostic groups.
Among most groups, individuals with both PDCs and LCOVID had the highest rates of primary, emergency, and inpatient utilization. Those with LCOVID or PDC alone also often had higher utilization than those with neither.
These findings underscore the need for accessible, cost-effective care for people with disabling conditions and Long COVID.

PMID:
42926767
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement