Authors
Kübranur Ünal, Leyla İbrahimkhanlı, Mehmet Emre Erol, Sabri Engin Altıntop, Nemat İbrahimkhanlı, Halit Nahit Şendur, Mahi Nur Cerit, Ethem Turgay Cerit
Published in
Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland). Volume 21. Issue 1. Pages 20261556. Epub Oct 26, 2026.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disease worldwide. Although dysglycaemia is a major risk factor, additional cardiometabolic disturbances contribute to the development of MASLD. This study aimed to identify parameters that distinguish MASLD among dysglycaemic individuals using body composition, anthropometric, biochemical, and imaging-based assessments.
In this cross-sectional study, male and female adults were stratified into three groups: dysglycaemic individuals with MASLD (MASLD-Dys), dysglycaemic individuals without MASLD (Dys), and normoglycaemic individuals without MASLD as healthy controls. Imaging-based hepatic fat quantification, body composition, anthropometric and biochemical parameters, and non-invasive indices assessing hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were evaluated.
Compared with Dys participants, MASLD-Dys participants had higher body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, trunk fat mass, ultrasound-derived hepatic fat fraction (USFF), and Fatty Liver Index (FLI). The strongest between-group separation was observed for USFF (p<0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, USFF showed the highest discriminative performance for MASLD-Dys vs. Dys, with an area under the curve of 0.925 and an optimal cut-off of ≥6.95 %.
USFF was the strongest discriminator of MASLD among dysglycaemic adults, while FLI provided a practical non-imaging alternative. These findings support integrating hepatic fat quantification and body composition measures into MASLD risk stratification beyond glycaemic status alone.
PMID:
42927361
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 17
- Comments 0