Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Treadmill or Overground? Cognitive-Motor Interference Effects in Healthy Older Individuals.

Created on 26 Oct 2026

Authors

Lara J Papin, Julius Welzel, Jessica Koschate-Storm, Tania Zieschang, Karsten Witt, Stefan Debener

Published in

The European journal of neuroscience. Volume 64. Issue 8.

Abstract

Walking is increasingly understood as a cognitively demanding activity requiring the integration of sensory processing, motor control and executive functions. When combined with a concurrent cognitive task (dual-tasking), cognitive-motor interactions may lead to changes in gait, behaviour and neurophysiology. In healthy aging, reduced motor automaticity may result in greater involvement of top-down control, increasing susceptibility to cognitive-motor interference and fall risk, even in the absence of clinical impairment. To explore real-world demands, we compared dual-tasking during outdoor overground walking and during indoor treadmill walking, using behavioural assessment of cognitive task performance, mobile electroencephalography and motion tracking with wearable sensors. Thirty-six older adults performed an auditory Go/No-Go task during both walking conditions and in a seated control condition. Compared to a stationary control condition, results confirmed significant dual-task interference effects during both walking conditions, and this effect was more pronounced during overground walking. The results suggest that overground walking imposes greater demands, leading to increased competition between cognitive and motor processes for shared cognitive resources. The consideration of natural conditions helps to identify the cognitive demands of locomotion.

PMID:
42927919
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement