Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Tensile bond strength between polyether ether ketone and resilient denture liners.

Created on 26 Oct 2026

Authors

Islam E Ali, Yoshiya Hirata, Yuka Sumita, Hidekazu Takahashi, Harunori Gomi

Published in

Journal of prosthodontic research. Oct 23, 2026. Epub Oct 23, 2026.

Abstract

To investigate the initial 24-h tensile bond strength (TBS) between polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and three resilient denture liners (RDLs) after different surface treatments.
The TBSs of two silicone RDLs (Reline II Soft [RL] and Sofreliner Tough Supersoft [ST]) and one methyl methacrylate RDL, Denture Liner [DL], on PEEK were evaluated. Square PEEK plates (n=240) were prepared and polished with #2000 SiC paper. Surface treatments included control (C; no treatment), sandblasting (SB) with 50-µm alumina powder, manufacturer-provided primer application (P), and SB + P. Ten specimens for each condition were prepared by sandwiching the RDL between two PEEK plates. TBS after 24-h water storage at 37°C was measured, and failure modes were recorded. Median TBS values were statistically analyzed.
Significant differences in TBS were found among RDLs within each surface treatment (P < 0.01) and among surface treatments within each RDL (P < 0.001). Median TBSs of C were 0.30, 0.17, and 0.73 MPa for RL, ST, and DL, respectively. SB and P increased median TBS, especially SB for DL (2.12 MPa) and P for RL (1.84 MPa) and ST (1.37 MPa). SB + P had the highest median TBSs regardless of material (1.64-2.55 MPa). All fracture surfaces showed adhesive failure except RL and ST treated with P and SB + P, which showed mixed and cohesive failures, respectively.
Initial TBSs varied with RDLs and surface treatments. P was more effective for silicone materials, whereas SB was more effective for the methyl methacrylate material.

PMID:
42927898
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement