Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cerebellar Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation for Insomnia Disorder: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.

Created on 26 Oct 2026

Authors

Xin-Yao Liu, Dong Dong, Chang-Geng Song, Yu-Xuan Ma, Dian-Wei Wu, Xuan Wang, Jian-Min Hao, Hui Li, Jing-Jing Zhao, Geng-Yao Hu, Feng Xia, Wen Jiang

Published in

CNS neuroscience & therapeutics. Volume 32. Issue 10.

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) in insomnia disorder (ID).
In this randomized sham-controlled trial, patients with ID received 2 weeks of active or sham cerebellar cTBS. The primary outcome was a ≥ 3-point improvement in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score after treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in sleep, mood, and resting-state fMRI.
Seventy-two patients (51 women; mean age, 44.3 ± 11.6 years) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. More patients in the active than sham group achieved a ≥ 3-point PSQI improvement after treatment (75.0% vs. 33.3%; adjusted OR, 6.06; 95% CI, 2.17-18.50; p < 0.001). Active cTBS reduced PSQI scores versus sham both post-treatment (adjusted mean difference, -3.34; 95% CI, -4.57 to -2.12; p < 0.001) and at 1 month (-3.70; 95% CI, -4.93 to -2.48; p < 0.001), and also improved Insomnia Severity Index, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, and Hamilton Depression Scale at both time points (all p < 0.01). Exploratory fMRI analyses identified several post-treatment connectivity differences between groups, but only right amygdala-right orbitofrontal connectivity showed a significant group-by-time interaction (FDR-adjusted p = 0.038). No serious adverse events occurred.
Cerebellar cTBS was well tolerated and promising for ID.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05992285).

PMID:
42929074
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement