Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A Multi-Strategy Crested Porcupine Optimizer for Work-Family Resource Allocation: Childcare Facility Siting and Family-Friendly Shift Scheduling.

Created on 26 Oct 2026

Authors

Yang Shi, Xinyu Cai

Published in

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 11. Issue 10. Oct 09, 2026. Epub Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

The time cost of care constrains female labour supply; two policy levers act on it: where childcare capacity is sited and how shifts are scheduled, both large combinatorial problems. The crested porcupine optimizer (CPO) initialises at random, guides exploitation by a single random or best individual and resizes its population on a fixed cycle. The proposed multi-strategy CPO (MSCPO) keeps CPO's four defence operators and replaces those original components with Sobol quasi-opposition initialisation, elite-guided exploitation and monotone fitness-based population reduction. On the 29 CEC2017 functions at 10, 30, 50 and 100 dimensions (30 runs of 30,000 evaluations), MSCPO had the best Friedman mean rank among ten algorithms at every dimension (1.29 against 2.53 for CPO; χ2(9) = 878.5, p < 0.001), and pooled Holm tests separated it from all nine competitors (p ≤ 0.002). A factorial ablation attributed about 70% of the gain to elite-guided exploitation. The advantage over CPO vanished at the full budget of 104D evaluations. In childcare siting, MSCPO ranked first, leaving the dispersion of access 28-35% below the most equal siting rule with at least 99% of the best rule's employment; in shift scheduling, it ranked fifth, with instrumentation suggesting a limitation of large steps under a rank-key decoder.

PMID:
42930272
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement