Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Effect of Previsit AI-Generated Document Summaries on Consultation Time and Patient-Physician Communication - The AI-INFOCARE Randomized Controlled Trial.

Created on 27 Oct 2026

Authors

Elida Benker-Hasani, Sven Richter, Clara Buszello, Sophia Willkommen, Markus Georg Prem, Mido Hijazi, Klaus Daniel Martin, Tareq Juratli, Ilker Y Eyüpoglu, Witold H Polanski

Published in

NEJM AI. Volume 3. Issue 11. Pages AIoa2600136. Epub Oct 15, 2026.

Abstract

Limited health literacy, clinical jargon, and time-constrained consultations often impair patients' understanding of medical findings. We evaluated whether AI-generated, quality-checked lay language summaries provided before consultations improve communication-related outcomes.
In this single-center, randomized trial in an outpatient neurosurgical setting, 300 adults were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard care with or without a quality-checked, AI-generated layperson summary of their medical findings (Simply Onno) before consultation. The primary end point was patient-reported quality of physician-patient interaction (Fragebogen zur Arzt-Patient-Interaktion [FAPI]). Secondary end points included autonomy support (Health Care Climate Questionnaire [HCCQ]), encounter difficulty (Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire [DDPRQ-10]), and consultation duration (minutes).
The mean FAPI score was higher in the intervention group (4.42±0.51 vs. 4.25±0.54; difference, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 0.29; P=0.005; Hedges' g=0.33), driven by shared decision-making (difference, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.42), with no evidence of a difference in perceived empathy. Patient-rated autonomy support was higher (difference, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.23), whereas physicians rated their own autonomy support slightly lower (difference, -0.12; cluster-robust 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.04). Median consultation time was 25 versus 33 minutes in the intervention group versus the control group, respectively, an approximate 21% relative reduction (ratio of geometric means, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88). For encounter difficulty (DDPRQ-10), we found potential evidence of a small increase (difference, 0.09; cluster-robust 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.21). Secondary end point confidence intervals were unadjusted for multiplicity.
AI-generated summaries provided before outpatient neurosurgical consultations were associated with better patient-reported interaction quality and autonomy support and shorter consultations. Physicians rated their own autonomy support as slightly lower in the intervention group; evidence for increased encounter difficulty was limited, with confidence intervals compatible with no difference. These findings support further evaluation of quality-checked, patient-facing document translation; effects on clinical outcomes and clinician workload require confirmation before routine adoption.

PMID:
42932468
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 100
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement